Part of the problem with the abundance of bad/mediocre design is probably budgetary, in that a lot of people can't afford to hire a truly qualified designer to do their stuff. And probably another part of the problem is the undervaluing of the field by non-designers with an "Oh, I can just do that myself, I've always had an eye for color" attitude. When trying to get ideas for our identity project, I was looking through a big book of logos, and I was surprised to find a lot of things in there that I found mediocre (example: I lost count of the number of logos incorporating the flowing-stick-figure-person generally employed by dance schools and stuff like that).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0380f/0380fe5375273fb4c5c5aa42bd8d2e6d884b1bf4" alt=""
The article brings up an interesting point that most design around us falls into the "quiet" category: efficient but not intrusive. This is the design that, even now, I pass constantly without really seeing. Maybe I'll try paying closer attention to see what I haven't noticed.
No comments:
Post a Comment